Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Editorials / Opinion


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Monday, June 22, 2009 at 4:54 PM

Comments (0)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Include a public-health insurance option

The goal of universal health insurance demands the widest possible consumers choices. Include the creativity and competition represented by a public-health insurance option in the mix of reforms before Congress.

Creation of a public-health-insurance option is central to the health-care reform debate underway in Congress.

Consumers need a competitive choice that is affordable, portable and fairly priced. Employers want relief from soaring insurance premiums.

The outlines of a federal plan are taking shape, and it has political traction because Americans are overwhelmingly in favor of a government option. A New York Times/CBS New Polls found 72 percent of respondents willing to support a federal plan that looks like Medicare for all. The poll also found a willingness to pay higher taxes so everyone was covered.

The country has been through this discussion before, but the need and frustration has reached a point where change can happen.

Separate plans are percolating through the House and Senate, and the public must be provided a lot more information. The cost to the public treasury is sobering — estimates as high as $1.6 trillion over 10 years. Expensive, but no one defends the ballooning costs of the current system.

Spreading the expense and maximizing coverage points toward individual and employer mandates, that require all citizens to have health insurance and all employers to provide it or a pay fee, perhaps 8 percent of payroll. Exemptions for small employers are predictable.

Insurers could not deny coverage for pre-existing conditions or raise premiums for those who are ill. Any public-insurance option would likely offer three or four plans with different benefits.

The availability of a public-health-insurance option is seen as a key driver of change within the private insurance market. Genuine competition for existing products.

The oft-repeated elements of slowing health costs are still in play: an emphasis on preventive care, Medicare savings, electronic-medical records and rewards for best practices and healthy outcomes.

The successful formula is likely to be a combination of cuts in spending and raising taxes, all with an eye toward providing health insurance for all.

After so many false starts and clever ads from opponents of health-care reform, the public is serious about change. Politicians notice.

Offering a public-health-insurance plan in the mix of reforms represents an infusion of competition to help spark results.

Copyright © 2009 The Seattle Times Company

More Editorials headlines...

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Comments
No comments have been posted to this article.


Get home delivery today!

More Editorials

NEW - 5:04 PM
Washington's state House should pass workers compensation reform bill

NEW - 5:05 PM
Breathe easier, a plan to stop burning coal for power

Heed auditor's recommendation about consolidating school health plans

Uncover managers' role in Seattle schools scandal

Detractors of crusade against childhood obesity should eat their words

Advertising

Video

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising