Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Editorials / Opinion


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Ed cetera

Join the informed, opinionated journalists of The Times' editorial staff in lively discussions at our blog Ed Cetera.

Blog Home | RSS feeds Subscribe | About the contributors

October 21, 2009 at 9:10 AM

Comments (9)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

Human Capital in Seattle Public Schools

Posted by Lynne Varner

The above headline is the title of a report upon which I based my column today arguing for performance-based pay for teachers. I went beyond the should we, shouldn't we, argument - we absolutely should! - to examine what kind of evaluation system would need to be in place before districts could determine a teacher's merit and thus, their pay.

This report by the National Council on Teacher Quality goes beyond the merit pay issue to offer a sharp and prescriptive look at how Seattle manages its teaching corps. Many things I knew, such as Seattle gives its biggest payraises to its most experienced teachers, leaving newer teachers - who might be performing better - out in the cold. But I didn't know about the correlation between a school's poverty rate and teacher absences. Ok, some of you might say this one is a no brainer. A teacher presiding over a wild and large class might be more likely to take more time off or burn out sooner. But the impact of frequent and prolonged teacher absences on student learning is something I don't hear the adults in this conversation talk about.

I dug out this Washington Post article on President Obama's efforts to use federal grants to spur more districts into experimenting with merit pay.

Oh, and the New Yorker article I mentioned is titled "The Rubber Room" and can be found here. What I found most distressing about the piece, and this one about Seattle teachers, is that it takes an appropriate protection like due process and pushes it out into bizarro world. It shouldn't take years to fire an employee. At the end, when the firing is upheld, can the school district ask for the years of salary back? An extreme level of due process may sound attractive but the costs, financial and otherwise, are borne by all of us.

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

To lkv and Liv Finne: Let's let a light shine on this issue. Let's learn a little bit about the Washington Policy Center. Perhaps, if...  Posted on October 21, 2009 at 5:42 PM by Teresa A., Seattle. Jump to comment
Ms Varner, Your obstinence on this issue seems somewhat unwarranted and not very helpful in your job as a journalist. It seems you have made...  Posted on October 21, 2009 at 8:49 PM by dman66. Jump to comment
The response from WPC's Liv Finne is galling in its ignorance of Seattle School District policies and in its obvious bias towards solutions it...  Posted on October 22, 2009 at 9:08 AM by dman66. Jump to comment

Recent entries

Nov 20, 09 - 3:29 PM
Round one: Washington out

Nov 20, 09 - 12:46 PM
Sarah Palin goes 'rogue'

Nov 19, 09 - 5:13 PM
Cogswell's Screed and the Seattle Left

Nov 19, 09 - 11:21 AM
A world of ''isms''

Nov 18, 09 - 7:39 PM
Mammograms, Part Two

Advertising

Advertising

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Advertising

Browse the archives

October 2009

September 2009

August 2009

July 2009

June 2009

May 2009

Blogroll
Blog roll