Originally published November 5, 2009 at 7:47 AM | Page modified November 5, 2009 at 9:46 AM
Comments (0)
E-mail article
Print view
Share
Democrats' plan to help 'uninsurables' questioned
You're afraid your cancer is back, and a health insurance company just turned you down.
Associated Press Writer
You're afraid your cancer is back, and a health insurance company just turned you down.
Under the health care bills in Congress, you could apply for coverage through a new high-risk pool that President Obama promises would immediately start serving patients with pre-existing medical problems.
Wait a second. Read the fine print. You may have to be uninsured for six months to qualify.
"If you are a cancer patient and have cancer now, you can't wait six months to go into a plan because your condition can go from bad to death," said Stephen Finan, a policy expert with the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network. He called the waiting period in the Senate bill "unacceptable."
Advocates for people with serious health problems, as well as some insurance experts, are raising questions about one of the most important upfront benefits in the Democratic health care legislation: a high-risk pool for the medically uninsurable.
Obama proposed the pool in his September health care speech to Congress. Intended to serve the most vulnerable as a temporary fail-safe, it would stay in place until 2013. That's when insurance companies would be banned from denying coverage because of medical problems. Government subsidies would also start that year to make coverage more affordable for millions of uninsured.
Now there are concerns about the design of the high-risk pools. Besides the six-month wait, there's a more fundamental issue - whether $5 billion set aside for the three-year program is enough. The money would be used to help people in poor health pay premiums.
Obama credits his Republican presidential rival, Sen. John McCain of Arizona, for the risk-pools idea. But when the GOP candidate proposed it in 2008, the estimated annual cost was $7 billion to $10 billion.
The Senate Finance Committee approved the six-month wait in its health care bill last month. To qualify, patients must be turned down for coverage because of a pre-existing condition and uninsured for at least six months.
"If you are somebody with cancer or a heart condition who needs immediate coverage and immediate treatment, that's not very helpful," said Karen Pollitz, a Georgetown University health policy professor.
Senate Finance staffers say the restriction is meant to prevent people from dropping more expensive coverage to take advantage of government assistance.
But the House health care bill unveiled last week by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., doesn't include a waiting period. Instead, it would require insurance plans who "dump" seriously ill patients to repay the federal pool. "The House provision will provide immediate relief for people with high-risk conditions who have no alternative for coverage," said Finan.
![]()
It may be easier to fix the waiting period than the financing.
When Obama embraced high-risk pools, he made what sounded like a broad promise. "For those Americans who can't get insurance today because they have pre-existing medical conditions, we will immediately offer low-cost coverage that will protect you against financial ruin if you become seriously ill," the president said.
The House and Senate followed up by setting aside $5 billion for the pools.
"It doesn't seem like it's near enough money," said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, who was a top domestic policy adviser for McCain. The McCain campaign ultimately concluded it could take as much as $20 billion a year to properly run risk pools, he said. The White House says McCain's proposal was more elaborate and not directly comparable to Obama's.
A House Republican bill released this week would provide $25 billion over 10 years for risk pools and other insurance programs for people in poor health. However, unlike the Democratic proposals, the GOP bill overall would cover far fewer uninsured.
If the Democrats' risk pool starts running out of money, the government may have to start a waiting list, raise premiums or take other unpopular measures. Congress could be asked for a bailout.
Several independent experts say concerns about the financing are valid.
"It would seem that ($5 billion) is going to be small relative to the need," said Thomas Buchmueller, a University of Michigan business professor.
Some 30 states now have risk pools for those who can't get health insurance on the private market, covering about 200,000 people at a cost of about $1 billion a year.
"This is clearly not going to be enough money to cover everybody," said Pollitz.
Insurance expert John Bertko, a visiting scholar at the Brookings Institution, said it may be possible to stretch the $5 billion, but there's a small margin for error.
Bertko said his "back of the envelope" math suggests there are about 1 million uninsured Americans in poor health, or five times the number currently covered by state high-risk pools. If all signed up for the new federal pool, it would burn through the $5 billion in a year.
However, people eligible for government benefits often fail to sign up. And if only one-third were to enroll, the budget could work.
That's cutting it close. "No doubt about that," said Bertko.
E-mail article
Print view
Share
UPDATE - 04:04 PM
Fort Hood suspect charged with attempted murder
Obama outlines Afghan escalation and exit
Analysis: Jobs forum a chance to get answers from business leaders
UPDATE - 03:23 PM
New stem cell lines approved for tax-paid research
UPDATE - 04:13 PM
WH social aide won't testify about gatecrashers
Suspect killed in South Seattle| Excerpt of police radio
The suspect wanted in the slaying of four police officers was killed early this morning. Audio excerpt of police radio conversation provided courtesy TImes reader Gary Osborne.

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech
nwautos
Dear Tom and Ray: My wife's 90-year-old aunt recently allowed us to take her 1995 Dodge Caravan with 55,000 miles. She said it needed to be driven, as...
Post a comment
nwjobs
Michelle Goodman blogs about work/life balance.
Survival jobs: Something to be thankful for
Post a comment
- Lakewood police shooting suspect killed by officer in South Seattle early today
- Four days in May set stage for Sunday's tragedy
- Loyal friends, family helped Clemmons flee police
- 2 men charged, several others suspected of aiding alleged cop killer
- E-mails show Washington state battled to keep Clemmons in custody
- Uncle: 'He was all about money ... suddenly, he was all about God'
- States at odds over warrant that might have kept Clemmons in jail
- Gregoire: no more Arkansas parolees
- Routine stolen-car check led to Lakewood police-slaying suspect
- Alleged getaway driver in officers' slaying could face murder charges
- Marines to be first wave in new Afghanistan plan
244 - Three men jailed on suspicion of aiding alleged cop killer
233 - E-mails show Washington state battled to keep Clemmons in custody
187 - Obama outlines Afghan escalation and exit
122 - States at odds over warrant that might have kept Clemmons in jail
112 - Mariners offer arbitration to Adrian Beltre, but not to Erik Bedard
112 - What yesterday's arbitration deadline means for the Mariners in terms of who they can sign
109 - Gregoire: no more Arkansas parolees
103 - Alleged getaway driver in officers' slaying could face murder charges
95 - Uncle: 'He was all about money ... suddenly, he was all about God'
88
- Lakewood police shooting suspect killed by officer in South Seattle early today
- Wine Adviser | Top Washington wine picks for 2009
- Four days in May set stage for Sunday's tragedy
- Recipe: Snickerdoodle Spritz
- Extreme beer: $150 a bottle, banned in 13 states
- An easygoing visit to Portland
- E-mails show Washington state battled to keep Clemmons in custody
- Boeing 787's wing fix passes crucial test, sources say
- Light rail project means end of some tailgating spots for UW for at least five years
- Some Washington banks are recovering, others see their options narrowing





