Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Business / Technology


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Tuesday, January 13, 2009 at 12:00 AM

Comments (8)     E-mail article     Print view

States eye Internet sales for more taxes

An estimated $3 billion in new revenue could be collected from Web retailers.

The Associated Press

NEW YORK — Shopping online can be a way to find bargains while steering clear of crowds — and sales taxes.

But those tax breaks are starting to erode. With the recession pummeling states' budgets, their governments increasingly want to fill the gaps by collecting taxes on Internet sales, which are growing even as the economy shudders.

And that is sparking conflict with companies that do business online only and have enjoyed being able to offer sales-tax-free shopping.

One of the most aggressive states, New York, is being sued by Seattle-based Amazon.com over a new requirement that online companies must collect taxes on shipments to New York residents, even if the companies are located elsewhere.

The amount of money at stake nationwide is unclear; online sales were expected to make up about 8 percent of all retail sales in 2008 and total $204 billion, according to Forrester Research. This is up from $175 billion in 2007. Based on that 2008 figure, Forrester analyst Sucharita Mulpuru says that if Web retailers had to collect taxes on all sales to consumers, it could generate an estimated $3 billion in new revenue for governments.

Collecting online sales taxes is not as simple as it might sound. A nationwide Internet business faces thousands of tax-collecting jurisdictions — states, counties and cities — and tangled rules about how various products are taxed. And a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court ruling said that states can't force businesses to collect sales taxes unless the businesses have operations in that state. The court also said Congress could lift the ban, which remains in place — for now.

As a result, generally only businesses with a "physical presence" in a state — such as a store or office building — collect sales tax on products sent to buyers in the same state. For instance, a Californian buying something from Barnes & Noble's Web site pays sales tax because the bookseller has stores in the Golden State. Buying the same thing directly from Amazon would not ring up sales tax.

In hopes of unraveling the complex tax rules — and bringing states more money — 22 states and many brick-and-mortar retailers support the efforts of a group called the Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board. The group is getting states to simplify and make uniform their numerous tax rates and rules, in exchange for a crack at taxing online sales.

New Jersey, Michigan and North Carolina are among the largest of the 19 states that have adjusted their tax laws to fully comply with the group's streamlined setup.

Washington was the only state to join in 2008, but more states may soon follow.

Companies that handle Web sales only have organized as well. NetChoice, whose members include eBay and online discount retailer Overstock.com, supports the states' tax-simplification efforts, but its executive director, Steve DelBianco, says online retailers should have to collect taxes only in states where they have a physical presence.

But what if the meaning of "physical presence" is changed? New York essentially did that in April when its budget included a provision requiring online retailers to collect taxes on purchases made by New Yorkers.

advertising

The new rule requires retailers to collect sales tax if they solicit business in New York by paying anyone within the state for leading customers to them. Since some Web-site operators within New York are compensated for posting ads that link to sites like Amazon, the online retailers would have to collect taxes.

Matt Anderson, spokesman for the New York state Division of the Budget, said the state expects to reap $23 million during the current fiscal year, which ends March 31, from newly collected online sales taxes.

Anderson said the state wants "to level the playing field and end the "unfair competitive advantage" Web-only companies have over brick-and-mortar stores that can't avoid collecting sales taxes.

Amazon complies, and collects sales taxes on shipments to New York. However, Amazon is still fighting the rule. It sued New York in April, alleging its provision is unconstitutional.

Amazon also said it is being specifically targeted by the law. The case is pending.

Amazon declined further comment.

Salt Lake City-based Overstock is also suing New York over the law.

Unlike Amazon, Overstock is not collecting sales tax in New York, because it ended agreements with about 3,400 affiliates in the state that were being paid for directing traffic to Overstock.com.

Copyright © 2009 The Seattle Times Company

More Business & Technology headlines...

E-mail article Print view      Share:    Digg     Newsvine

Comments
Open letter to WA and all the other states... You steal enough money. Leave us alone!  Posted on January 13, 2009 at 3:07 AM by dvaudio. Jump to comment
I hope that they do not require amazon to start collecting sales tax. If you combine amazons already low prices, and no sales tax you can great...  Posted on January 13, 2009 at 8:50 AM by chris250480. Jump to comment
I don't see why anyone is complaining. Democrats advocate myriad social programs paid for the public treasury. Funding for those programs...  Posted on January 13, 2009 at 8:57 AM by Veritas Maximus. Jump to comment


Get home delivery today!

Landmark Smith Tower mostly vacant

Toyota's Toyoda scolds execs for emulating U.S. car companies' mistakes

Money Makeover: Financial makeover: A "go-getter" goes after her spending habit

Do your homework before buying brokered CDs

Mutual-fund deposits shift into low gear

Advertising

Video

AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 
Advertising