Originally published Saturday, November 8, 2008 at 12:00 AM
Comments (5)
E-mail article
Print view
Why might auto industry get federal bailout? Jobs
General Motors reported a $2.5 billion loss in the third quarter and warned Friday that it could run out of cash in 2009 if the U.S. economic slump continues and it doesn't get government aid.
General Motors reported a $2.5 billion loss in the third quarter and warned Friday that it could run out of cash in 2009 if the U.S. economic slump continues and it doesn't get government aid.
GM also said it has suspended talks to acquire Chrysler. While it didn't specifically name the automaker, GM said it was setting aside considerations for a "strategic acquisition."
And Ford said Friday it lost $129 million in the third quarter as the struggling automaker burned through $7.7 billion in cash and set plans for more job cuts.
Ford said it will eliminate about 2,260 more white-collar employees in North America as it battles weak demand, the credit crisis and the worst economic downturn in decades.
On Thursday, top executives with GM, Ford and Chrysler, along with the president of the United Auto Workers, made their pleas to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on Thursday for a rescue package.
Detroit's automakers may end up getting taxpayers' money for a simple reason: jobs.
Here is a look at why the companies are seeking a federal bailout and the challenges they face in getting government funding.
Q. Why are the auto companies asking for the government's help?
A. The automakers have been hurt by the weakened economy, the credit crunch and consumers' shift away from profitable sport-utility vehicles.
U.S. auto sales declined last month to their lowest level in more than 17 years. As a result, the companies are running out of cash — GM and Ford said Friday that they burned through a combined $14.6 billion in the third quarter. GM warned it could run out of cash in 2009.
Q. What are GM, Ford and Chrysler asking for?
A. A combined $50 billion in government funding. The companies asked congressional leaders this week for $25 billion in loans to help it survive the economic decline and another $25 billion to help cover some of its health-care obligations for 780,000 retirees and dependents. The funding could come from the $700 billion government federal bailout of the country's financial sector, or from the Federal Reserve.
![]()
Q. How would this auto bailout differ from the government's bailout of the nation's banks?
A. The main difference is that under the financial bailout, the government has invested billions of dollars directly into banks in return for an ownership stake. For the auto industry, discussions haven't centered on the government taking partial ownership of the companies.
The Treasury Department has limited participation in the $700 billion bailout to financial companies that can then use the money to make loans. Some analysts think the auto-financing companies would have to convert to banks or thrifts to be eligible.
Q. Why is Congress considering a bailout for the auto industry?
A. Simply put, jobs. For every job in an assembly plant, there are 7.5 jobs with auto-parts suppliers and other companies, meaning the industry accounts for millions of jobs. In a grim prediction, the Ann Arbor, Mich.-based Center for Automotive Research estimated that about 2.5 million jobs across the economy would disappear in the first year if the U.S. auto industry shrunk by 50 percent.
Q. Would the government play a role in a merger between GM and Chrysler?
A. GM said Friday it had suspended talks with Cerberus Capital Management, the majority owner of Chrysler. The companies held private talks because GM reportedly coveted Chrysler's $11 billion in cash, but any deal would have required government financing. Discussions with the Treasury Department were unsuccessful.
Q. Didn't the automakers receive government funding earlier this year?
A. Yes. Congress approved a separate $25 billion in low-interest loans to U.S. automakers and suppliers to help them build more fuel-efficient cars to meet tougher fuel economy standards. But the funding is not expected to arrive until sometime next year and the companies say they're running out of time.
Q. Can the auto industry expect help from the incoming Obama administration?
A. During the campaign, President-elect Obama was supportive of the $25 billion loan program for fuel-efficient vehicles and said he would double it to $50 billion. Obama said Friday that his transition team would explore ways of helping the industry, but he hasn't taken a position yet on any bailout of the car companies.
Q. If the government helps the companies, what will taxpayers get in return?
A. Auto-industry officials say any help would come with strings attached and expectations of full repayment, with interest, on the loans. Possible protections include a limit on executive compensation, awarding the government preferred stock in the companies and a suspension of dividends to investors.
Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company
Glass half full for Microsoft shareholders
Boeing warns of 49 possible layoffs locally
Boeing breaks ground for historic SC plant
Brier Dudley: Brad Pitt company buys film rights to Redmond-based Airtight Games' 'Dark Void'
Dendreon's Provenge gets FDA review date

MLS trophy arrives in Seattle
Seattle welcomes the Philip F. Anschutz Trophy via ferry to kick-off MLS festivities.
nwjobs

Post a comment

Michelle Goodman blogs about work/life balance.
How to tell your office you're gravely ill
Post a comment
nwautos

Choosing a new sedan? Weigh the impact of your choice on your wallet and on the planet.
Post a comment
- Man falls 8 stories, suffers minor injuries
- 'Unusual circumstances' in death of Boeing worker
- Monfort fired after excellent worker turned unreliable
- Boeing facility death was suicide
- Italian prosecutor: Knox hated murder victim
- Swedish threatens to end Regence BlueShield's contract
- Bail lowered for Clearly Lasik doctor in murder-for-hire plot
- Man sentenced to 31 years in prison in girlfriend's slaying on I-5
- Seattle Schools return to neighborhood-based system
- Movie review | Bella + Edward + Jacob = a pale 'New Moon'
- Convicted killer: US student Knox at murder scene
261 - State's projected budget shortfall exceeds $2 billion
249 - What climate-change deniers really believe (and why they're wrong)
186 - Swedish threatens to end Regence BlueShield's contract
165 - Senate Democrats want to tax nips and tucks
116 - Italian prosecutors wrap up in Knox murder trial
104 - A Mariners-Tigers swap makes a whole lot of sense for both teams
72 - Monfort fired after excellent worker turned unreliable
65 - Man sentenced to 31 years in prison in girlfriend's slaying on I-5
62 - 2010 county budget cuts services, 311 jobs
60
- Seattle Schools return to neighborhood-based system
- Swedish threatens to end Regence BlueShield's contract
- The Blotter | Police: Would-be ninja impaled by metal fence
- Bail lowered for Clearly Lasik doctor in murder-for-hire plot
- From Methow Valley to Paradise, here are 5 great spots to stage your own winter games. (Hold the glam.)
- Peruvian police: Gang killed people for their fat
- Recipes: Sesame Pork Roast, Sour Cream Mashed Potatoes, Gingerbread with Lemon Sauce and more
- Dave Grohl is part of the trans-generational supergroup Them Crooked Vultures
- Man falls 8 stories, suffers minor injuries
- State schools chief wants to delay dates for passing key tests






