Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Business / Technology


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Sunday, October 5, 2008 at 12:00 AM

Comments (0)     E-mail article     Print view

Turf tussle over reclassifying annuities

A proposal by the Securities and Exchange Commission to classify equity-indexed annuities as securities instead of insurance has generated...

A proposal by the Securities and Exchange Commission to classify equity-indexed annuities as securities instead of insurance has generated a minifuror.

The vehicles — which had $123 billion at year-end, according to the SEC — combine the promise of regular payments with the potential for stock-market gains. The proposal would have the SEC, instead of individual states, regulate the annuities. Insurance agents stand to lose substantial income if the annuities are sold only by securities brokers.

Critics charge that investors don't understand the fees often attached to indexed annuities. Surrender charges for withdrawal before a certain period can be as high as 15 to 20 percent, erasing any interest gains, says the SEC.

Chris Cordaro, a financial planner with Regent Atlantic Capital, supports the SEC plan.

"If I bought 100 shares of IBM and I decided it was a mistake, it would cost $10 to get out at a discount broker. If I bought one of these contracts, it could cost me 8 percent to get out, or if you have one of these horrible contracts, it could cost 18 percent to get out."

Robb Edwards, managing principal at AnnuityWorks, who opposes the plan, says liquidity features that allow withdrawals — typically up to 10 percent a year — without penalty are "a basic feature offered by many, many products." In return, the products guarantee most of an investor's principal.

In its proposal, the SEC says "the protections offered in these indexed annuities may give the instruments an aspect of insurance, but we do not believe that these protections are substantial enough."

Insurance rules vary by state.

"For years, there's been a tremendous effort by the states, including Iowa, and the major industry players to make sure that the consumers get what they need," says Jim Mumford, Iowa's first deputy insurance commissioner. "The SEC has not recognized what the insurance regulators have done in the last two years."

Edwards acknowledges some marketers gloss over surrender fees.

"There are some carriers out there who have historically promoted and marketed the product in a way that was not helpful," he says, but that in itself doesn't justify reclassifying the product.

Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company

More Business & Technology headlines...

E-mail article Print view      Share:    Digg     Newsvine

Comments
No comments have been posted to this article.

advertising

An 802.11n upgrade could make a big difference

Retailers opening doors on Thanksgiving Day

UPDATE - 02:36 AM
Google makes concessions on digital book deal

Critics want to block Comcast-NBC deal

Google submits revised book settlement

Advertising

Video

Opening day at Crystal Mountain
Skiers crowded the slopes at Crystal Mountain for one of the resort's earliest openings.

Video shows violent arrest by SPD
Fort Lewis Memorial
Highlights: Ken Auletta talks about "Googled"
Seattle International Cabaret Festival
Ken Auletta talks about "Googled"
Medal of Honor
Pelosi answers questions at Swedish Medical Center
Pelosi speaks at Swedish Medical Center
"Pistol" Pete Ryan

Marketplace

nwautos

2009's most fuel-efficient sedansnew
Choosing a new sedan? Weigh the impact of your choice on your wallet and on the planet.
Post a comment

Open Houses

Find this weekend's open house listings.
Or search by location:

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 
Advertising