Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Business / Technology


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published September 9, 2007 at 12:00 AM | Page modified September 9, 2007 at 2:05 AM

E-mail article     Print view

Housing fees don't damp building boom

Requiring developers to pay into an affordable-housing fund in exchange for allowing them to build taller residential buildings has not...

Seattle Times business reporter

Taller and skinnier downtown

New projects

Most residential projects seeking development approval in the year since new regulations were passed for downtown Seattle plan to take full or near-full advantage of increased height limits.

Project Proposed units

1521 2nd Ave. 143

2000 3rd Ave. 431

2301 6th Ave. 646

1823 Minor Ave. 412

600 Wall St. 224*

2105 6th Ave. 327

1430 2nd Ave. 200

901 Lenora N/A

815 Pine St. 400

1921 5th Ave. 166

*Seeks to rise 290 feet, well below the 400-foot maximum allowed.

Source: Seattle Department of Planning and Development

Requiring developers to pay into an affordable-housing fund in exchange for allowing them to build taller residential buildings has not put a damper on the downtown development boom, say city officials and real-estate executives.

Nine of 10 residential projects seeking development approval under the new regulations are expected to pay into the affordable-housing fund and build to the maximum or near-maximum allowed heights, according to the city's Planning and Development Department.

Those regulations, which took effect in spring 2006, allow residential developers to build to 400 feet, or about 40 floors, in parts of downtown's Denny Triangle, an area now dominated by parking lots and low-rise buildings.

Elsewhere downtown, residential developers are allowed to build to 45 stories or more.

In one Denny Triangle section, for example, developers pay nothing for affordable housing if they stay below the designated base height limit of 290 feet.

For every floor above that, they pay $15 to $25 a square foot up to the maximum height limit of 400 feet. The higher the floor, the higher the rate, since the views tend to be better and worth more to developers.

At the same time, new buildings may not be as wide as the old, in the belief that tall-but-skinny buildings create an elegant skyline and allow more sunlight onto the streets.

Mayor Greg Nickels initially proposed a single rate of $10 a square foot for floors above the base height limit.

When rates set by the City Council turned out to be twice as much, developers warned that the vision of a bustling downtown with lots of gleaming new skyscrapers might not happen.

Those warnings have not been borne out so far, though.

City planners said they're sensitive to developers' concerns but also want to ensure that people of all income levels can afford to live downtown.

"We have to balance getting something back and stifling development," said Department of Planning and Development Director Diane Sugimura. "If we start asking for too much, do they say, 'Forget it, We're going to Redmond'? We don't want that, but obviously, we think we can do both."

Blaine Weber, principal of the Seattle-based architecture firm Weber + Thompson, is involved with a dozen residential projects downtown. "I don't think the fees are so onerous that they prevent projects from being economically viable," he said.

For the high-end 1521 Second Ave. condominium project going up near Pike Place Market, the new regulations mean it can rise 38 stories, versus 24 stories previously. The project's required contribution to affordable housing: $1.75 million.

The average sales price of a unit in the project is $1.8 million, said William Justen of The Justen Co., which is helping manage the development.

He said paying the fees and taking advantage of the new height limits make economic sense "because we're doing really high-end homes" and buyers can afford to foot the bill through a surcharge of about $12,000 each.

But he added: "Everything gets passed on."

"If you have a more typical condominium building where the average price is $700,000 or $800,000, it would have more of an impact, and it definitely drives up prices," Justen said.

Amy Martinez: 206-464-2923 or amartinez@seattletimes.com

Copyright © 2007 The Seattle Times Company

More Business & Technology headlines...

E-mail article Print view      Share:    Digg     Newsvine

advertising

Seattle-area homebuilder losing projects to foreclosure

Microsoft names Sinofsky to head Windows

Costco, Nordstrom, other retailers report weak June sales

UPDATE - 03:02 PM
New General Motors about to roll off assembly line

UPDATE - 01:25 PM
Jobless claims indicate economy remains weak

Advertising

Video

AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 
Advertising