Originally published May 13, 2007 at 12:00 AM | Page modified May 13, 2007 at 2:01 AM
Economist believes taxing women less could help everyone
Lower income-tax rates for women while raising them for men, according to Harvard University economist Alberto Alesina, who calls the idea "discrimination, the good kind.
Minneapolis Star Tribune
MINNEAPOLIS — Want to reduce the overall level of income taxes and see more women taking home paychecks?
Lower income-tax rates for women while raising them for men, according to Harvard University economist Alberto Alesina, who calls the idea "discrimination, the good kind."
"The female tax rate should be no greater than about 80 percent of that of males and possibly much less," Alesina and a co-author wrote in a recent paper that's grabbing attention among those concerned about the persistent gap between the sexes, both in work-force participation and average earnings.
The provocative notion hasn't taken long to draw skeptics, who doubt whether politicians ever would — or should — follow the advice.
Alesina and Andrea Ichino of Italy's University of Bologna argue that tax codes in the United States and around the world already apply different standards to all manner of people — the single and the married, for example, and families with children and those without.
At last count, 73 percent of U.S. men had jobs or were looking for work.
In contrast, 59 percent of women were in the labor force.
While many factors affect a woman's decision to work or stay home, multiple studies have shown that part of the explanation is that women are often more sensitive to changes in tax rates than men.
In other words, if they believe they'll be able to keep more of the wages earned outside the home, they're more likely to take a job or retain the one they have rather than leave the work force for family or other reasons.
Alesina and Ichino conclude that a small increase in income taxes for men would finance the larger cut in income taxes for women because as more women chose to work, they'd pay more as a group in income taxes.
They project that the overall tax burden would decline as income-tax rates on women fall more sharply than income tax rates on men rise.
Married men also would benefit from the change, Alesina contends, since they would share in the extra income and lower tax rate on the earnings of their wives.
![]()
"Single men may not be too happy about it," Alesina conceded. "But you can't make everybody happy."
The economists argue that their ideas are aimed at current social goals in the United States and throughout the developed world.
"These effects are consistent with the stated goal of affirmative-action policies geared toward correcting discrimination and inequities in the labor market against women," Alesina and Ichino wrote.
Lowering income-tax rates on women would be a more efficient way of bringing women into the work force than anti-discrimination policies imposed on business, in their view.
Copyright © 2007 The Seattle Times Company
Chase shrugs off loss of CD investors
Sunday Buzz: Expedia, Intelius, Classmates slapped by Senate report
Denny Triangle gains skyline, but tenants slow to come
UPDATE - 04:28 PM
Senate Democrats at odds over health care bill
Your Funds: Money for nothing: Some investors pay for advice they never get

LA Galaxy's David Beckham
Los Angeles Galaxy's David Beckham talks about the upcoming MLS Cup final during after a team practice.
nwjobs

Post a comment

Michelle Goodman blogs about work/life balance.
How to tell your office you're gravely ill
Post a comment
nwautos

Choosing a new sedan? Weigh the impact of your choice on your wallet and on the planet.
Post a comment
- 'The Road' takes Viggo Mortensen to Mount St. Helens and Astoria, Ore.
- Craigslist adoption ad: A plea by young mother-to-be? A scam?
- Italian lead prosecutor argues Knox motive was hatred
- Italian prosecutors request life sentence for UW student
- Tugboat sinks on Seattle's waterfront
- Child-support error costs nearly $21,000
- Man shot in chest on E. Union Street in Capitol Hill
- Washington state wines make annual best-of list
- Chase shrugs off loss of CD investors
- Mariners Blog | A Mariners-Tigers swap makes a whole lot of sense for both teams
- Senate vote clears hurdle
236 - Tight Senate vote launches health care over hurdle
119 - Child-support error costs nearly $21,000
118 - Vikings easily beat the Seahawks
115 - Palin excitement builds in Tri-Cities
115 - Prosecutor requests life in prison for Amanda Knox
87 - Cutting through breast-cancer confusion
86 - Game thread
70 - New York terror trials will restore faith in rule of law
52 - Chase shrugs off loss of CD investors
47
- Washington state wines make annual best-of list
- Nonprofits get creative using Twitter and Facebook to make donation easier
- It's possible to recover a life lost to hoarding
- Lynnwood is reinventing itself — again
- Great places to cross-country ski for free (or almost) in the Methow
- 'The Road' takes Viggo Mortensen to Mount St. Helens and Astoria, Ore.
- Child-support error costs nearly $21,000
- Recipes: Sesame Pork Roast, Sour Cream Mashed Potatoes, Gingerbread with Lemon Sauce and more
- Banff: powder, peaks & purity
- 175 foster kids in Washington get 'forever families'





