Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Business / Technology


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Friday, March 2, 2007 at 12:00 AM

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Hearst asks for delay in group's lawsuit

The owner of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer asked a judge Thursday to postpone a committee's lawsuit against both Seattle newspapers until...

Seattle Times staff reporter

The owner of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer asked a judge Thursday to postpone a committee's lawsuit against both Seattle newspapers until late June, after a private arbitrator has decided the two companies' claims against each other.

The Hearst Corp. also asked King County Superior Court Judge Greg Canova to make a decision on the postponement request Monday.

With Hearst and The Seattle Times Co. deep in preparations for a climactic arbitration hearing that could decide the P-I's fate, "every day is significant," Hearst's lawyers wrote.

A Times spokeswoman said her company supports Hearst. A lawyer for the Committee for a Two-Newspaper Town (CTNT), target of Hearst's moves, said both newspapers are trying to stall.

The Times and Hearst have been fighting in court since 2003 over the future of their joint-operating agreement (JOA), under which The Times handles most business functions for both papers.

Last spring, they agreed to let a private arbitrator decide the dispute.

The arbitration hearing is scheduled to start April 9; a ruling is expected by May 31. If The Times wins, the P-I could close.

CTNT, which is not involved in the arbitration but is an intervenor in the underlying 2003 lawsuit, filed a motion last week challenging part of the JOA that allows Hearst to close the P-I and still collect part of The Times' profits until 2083.

Canova is scheduled to decide that motion April 6, just one business day before the arbitration hearing starts.

In its request Thursday, Hearst said it would be "exceedingly difficult" for the newspapers to prepare to fight each other and the committee simultaneously in different forums.

CTNT hasn't pursued until recently the claims it filed 3 1/2 years ago, Hearst said, and won't suffer any harm if its motion is postponed.

Committee lawyer Kathy George disagreed.

advertising

Her client wants to eliminate the possibility that Hearst could close the P-I and collect part of The Times profits "once and for all, regardless of how the arbitration of the newspapers' contract dispute is resolved," she said in an e-mail.

In a related matter, Canova is scheduled to decide next Friday whether the newspapers must turn over to the committee 3.5 million pages of documents produced in preparation for the closed-door arbitration hearing.

The companies say that, too, would impose an enormous burden with the hearing looming.

Eric Pryne: 206-464-2231 or epryne@seattletimes.com

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

More Business & Technology

UPDATE - 09:46 AM
Exxon Mobil wins ruling in Alaska oil spill case

UPDATE - 09:32 AM
Bank stocks push indexes higher; oil prices dip

UPDATE - 08:04 AM
Ford CEO Mulally gets $56.5M in stock award

UPDATE - 07:54 AM
Underwater mortgages rise as home prices fall

NEW - 09:43 AM
Warner Bros. to offer movie rentals on Facebook

More Business & Technology headlines...


Get home delivery today!

Video

Advertising

AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising