Originally published Tuesday, February 6, 2007 at 12:00 AM
Deal reached in long fight over Apple name, logo
"We can work it out. " That was the message that iPod maker Apple Inc. and The Beatles' guardian Apple Corps sent Monday in burying nearly...
The Associated Press
SAN JOSE, Calif. — "We can work it out."
That was the message that iPod maker Apple Inc. and The Beatles' guardian Apple Corps sent Monday in burying nearly three decades of trademark strife over the iconic apple logo and name.
Like the warring lovers striving for reconciliation in The Beatles' 1965 hit tune, the two Apples agreed to quash a long-simmering rivalry and years of vicious legal battles between one of the world's largest music sellers and one of history's most beloved bands.
The settlement gives Apple Inc. ownership of the name and logo in return for agreeing to license some of those trademarks back to London-based Apple Corps — guardian of The Beatles' commercial interests — for their continued use.
It ends the ongoing trademark lawsuit between the two companies, with each side paying its own legal costs. Other terms of the settlement were not disclosed.
But the truce was silent on a crucial issue for consumers: whether the catalog of Beatles songs will become available for download any time soon.
The Beatles have so far been the most prominent holdout from iTunes and other online music services, and Apple's overtures to put the music online have been stymied by the ongoing litigation.
And it appears consumers will still have to wait to buy such Beatles hits as "Love Me Do" or "Hey Jude" on Apple Inc.'s iTunes online store, though industry analysts said a resolution on putting The Beatles' music online is likely already in the works.
"It goes from impossible to a lock that it's going to happen — it's a function of time at this point," said Gene Munster, senior research analyst with investment bank Piper Jaffray. "I bet they move pretty fast."
Jaffray estimates that Apple Inc. paid The Beatles $50 million to $100 million for the rights to the Apple name. That would come on top of more than $26.5 million Apple paid to settle past disputes with Apple Corps.
It's no secret that Steve Jobs — Apple Inc.'s chief executive officer and a huge Beatles fan — has wanted the British band's music on iTunes, which has sold more than 2 billion songs worldwide and has catapulted Apple into the top ranks of music sellers.
Jobs even cued up some Beatles music and album art in unveiling the company's highly anticipated iPhone gadget at the Macworld Conference and Expo last month, setting off rampant speculation that some type of deal might be in the works.
![]()
Decades of legal disputes between the two companies have thus far made any partnership all but impossible.
"We love the Beatles, and it has been painful being at odds with them over these trademarks," Jobs said in a statement. "It feels great to resolve this in a positive manner, and in a way that should remove the potential of further disagreements in the future."
Elizabeth Freund, the U.S. spokeswoman for Apple Corps, said the Beatles' recording label, Britain's EMI Group, would first need an agreement with Apple Corps before licensing any music to Apple Inc. or other online services. She said no such deal has been reached yet.
The Beatles' company, whose corporate logo is a giant green Granny Smith apple, first sued Apple Inc. for trademark infringement in 1978. The computer maker agreed in 1981 to pay $80,000 and never enter the music business.
Apple Corps sued again nearly a decade later, alleging the musical instrument digital interface, or MIDI, software included on Apple's Macintosh computers violated those terms. Apple Inc. again settled, agreeing in 1991 to pay $26.5 million to secure the rights to the apple logo for selling computers and software, while Apple Corps would get it for producing and selling music.
But the tension flared again in 2003 while Apple Inc. was signing up recording labels to offer their songs through Apple's new iTunes download store and attempted to woo The Beatles' management.
Apple Corps contended that Apple Inc.'s use of the logo on iTunes amounted to a breach of the 1991 agreement. Lawyers for Apple Inc. have argued that music lovers are smart enough to tell the difference between the logos. Apple Corps uses a shiny green apple as its logo, while Apple Inc. has a cartoon-like apple with a bite taken out.
A British judge ruled in May that Apple Inc.'s logo is used in association with the store — not the music — and thus permitted. The settlement announced Monday replaces the 1991 agreement and makes an appeal of that ruling unnecessary. Neil Aspinall, manager of Apple Corps, said the company was glad to resolve the dispute.
"The years ahead are going to be very exciting times for us," he said in a statement. "We wish Apple Inc. every success and look forward to many years of peaceful cooperation with them."
UPDATE - 09:46 AM
Exxon Mobil wins ruling in Alaska oil spill case
UPDATE - 09:32 AM
Bank stocks push indexes higher; oil prices dip
UPDATE - 08:04 AM
Ford CEO Mulally gets $56.5M in stock award
UPDATE - 07:54 AM
Underwater mortgages rise as home prices fall
NEW - 09:43 AM
Warner Bros. to offer movie rentals on Facebook

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech
nwautos
(Daihatsu) Daihatsu FC Sho Case This futuristic four-seater debuted at the Tokyo auto show in December. Its seats can fold flat into the floor and th...
Post a comment
- Madrona dad killed by a bullet as he drove through Central Area
- SPU surprises neighbors with sale of Queen Anne rec property
- Beer-drinking bridge builders will get training from a counselor
- Matt Flynn has good day in Seahawks' 3-way QB competition
- Boy's pat on president's head captured for history
- Why dealing for Kellen Winslow makes sense for Seahawks | Steve Kelley
- Police arrest New Jersey man who confessed to killing Etan Patz
- Amazon addresses criticism at meeting
- Driver fatally shot in Central Area
- Facebook messages trigger melee at Whitman Middle School
- Opponents of gay-marriage law say they have enough signatures
860 - Mariners look to get back on winning track against Angels
472 - Madrona dad killed by stray bullet as he drove through Central Area
260 - Komen controversy hurting Race for the Cure
216 - Typical CEO made $9.6M last year, AP study finds
148 - Sources: DOJ sends letters to city blasting police reform efforts
138 - Fact check: Ad exaggerates Obama's debt
96 - Driver caught in crossfire, fatally shot in Central Area
89 - It's been great; see you soon in my new columns
71 - Eric Wedge not happy with Mariners after 14-strikeout perfromance versus Dan Haren
60
- Madrona dad killed by a bullet as he drove through Central Area
- Dig into colorful history at Oregon's John Day Fossil Beds
- Get a sitter — please — for these 10 great date-night restaurants | All You Can Eat
- SPU surprises neighbors with sale of Queen Anne rec property
- Beer-drinking bridge builders will get training from a counselor
- Zumiez rebounds from recession better than most
- Boy's pat on president's head captured for history
- Driver fatally shot in Central Area
- Downtown building fetches $55M, thanks to Amazon effect
- Gates Foundation grants give local groups a boost










