![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Your account | Today's news index | Weather | Traffic | Movies | Restaurants | Today's events | ||||||||
|
|
Sunday, July 11, 2004 - Page updated at 12:00 A.M.
Carol Kleiman / Syndicated columnist
That's why McConnell gave workers a choice: Pay a portion of the cost of health care or sign up for the company's innovative Healthy Choices Wellness program and earn a fully paid premium. The program was introduced in 2003. So far, 3,600 employees and their spouses are in the program, working to meet specific health goals.
Another benefit the company offers, which I think is extremely helpful though it's not directly related to health, is inexpensive haircuts on company time. That's a perk Worthington introduced in 1961! New approach: What federal law can be used to bring women who work in science into equity with men? Debra Rolison, head of the Advanced Electrochemical Materials section at the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, D.C., says the answer is Title IX. That law says no person on the basis of sex shall be denied benefits of education or activities receiving federal aid. "Title IX is a mechanism that can be used to stimulate change," according to Rolison, who spoke on the subject at a meeting of the American Physical Society. The session was sponsored by the Committee on the Status of Women in Physics.
Rolison, whose talk was published in the society's newsletter, also is an adjunct professor of chemistry. She suggests it's time to apply Title IX, which has made such a difference for female college athletes, "as a strategy on behalf of women faculty in chemistry departments." She notes that in 2002, women made up only 12 percent of faculty at the top 50 college research departments in chemistry. She adds: "We have got to get out of our lily-white male university if we want to stay at the forefront of science."
They include free weekend family vacations every two years at a resort; wedding, baby and anniversary gifts; full reimbursement for home computers; and a six-month parental leave after a birth or adoption. The latter includes 12 weeks of leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act.
New definitions: "What, however, are 'work and family' issues?" That's a question asked by Dan Clawson in his book, "The Next Upsurge: Labor and the New Social Movements" (Cornell University Press, $18.95). Here's the answer that the professor of sociology at the University of Massachusetts gives: "Most public discussion sees the issues in terms of such matters as family leave, flextime and child care," Clawson says. "But union leaders don't accept that definition, arguing that it is far too narrow. 'When you look at a union contract,' noted one union member, 'there's lots in there that are work/family issues, for instance, your pay, your insurance, your hospitalization, your pension, your days off which most professionals take for granted.' " Clawson adds: "You don't realize they are work and family issues until workers no longer have them, especially sick leave or vacation or disability pay all of which are things that for the most part were originally union-negotiated benefits. "In that context, some unions are justifiably proud of the benefits they have won and conscious of the way they improve family life." E-mail questions to Carol Kleiman at ckleiman@tribune.com. Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News.
Copyright 2004, Chicago Tribune
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
seattletimes.com home
Home delivery
| Contact us
| Search archive
| Site map
| Low-graphic
NWclassifieds
| NWsource
| Advertising info
| The Seattle Times Company